Grip is an AI-powered event networking and matchmaking platform built for conferences, trade shows, and confex events. Its core strength is connecting people: badge scanning, lead retrieval, AI-driven meeting recommendations (Grip cites using large data sets and multiple matchmaking strategies), personalized attendee schedules, and an exhibitor portal that covers registration, profile management, and meeting bookings. Grip also offers a broader event management system (EMS) for registration and event operations, and it is generally positioned toward larger, enterprise-scale commercial organizers. Notably, Grip has publicly announced a partnership with ExpoFP to power the interactive floor plan and wayfinding layer inside its own app — a detail worth knowing if you're evaluating either platform for floor plan capability specifically.
ExpoFP is a focused, floor-plan-first platform. It is built around map-first booth inventory and reservation logic: organizers create interactive floor plans, manage booth status and pricing, and — on paid plans — sell booths online directly through the map (Subscription + Payments plans start at $269/mo for up to 100 booths). Attendees get browser-based wayfinding with no app download required, and the platform is web-first with solid mobile support. ExpoFP handles multi-building and multi-level venues, supports embeddable floor plans and exhibitor lists for organizer websites, and offers a free plan alongside a 7-day full-featured trial. Published DIY pricing starts at $149/mo.
This page is for teams comparing ExpoFP vs Grip, looking for a Grip alternative focused specifically on interactive floor plans, booth sales, and attendee wayfinding — rather than a full networking, matchmaking, and lead-retrieval suite. If your primary need is mapping your show floor, managing booth inventory, and letting exhibitors and attendees find each other on a map, this comparison is built for you. It's also relevant if you already use Grip for registration, matchmaking, or lead retrieval and are trying to understand how floor plan mapping fits into — or sits alongside — that stack, since the two products approach the "map the show floor" problem from very different starting points.